If you’re like me and really enjoy reading license agreements, you can learn more here. Named users are great for heavy users and managers/executives that require guaranteed access.ĭepending on when you purchased your SAP BusinessObjects solution, you may not have access to CSBLs in your licensing model and may require a conversion to the new licensing model that supports CSBLs. CSBLs are great for casual users that require intermittent access to the system. They map well to real world requirements.Both CSBL and named user licenses are monitored by the software, so it’s easy to stay in compliance. Virtualized hardware is fully supported by this licensing model. Unlike CPU licensing, as much hardware can be used to solve the BI problem as required without worrying about licensing impact. IT doesn’t have to count CPUs on the system according to arbitrary rules. If a system has 25 CSBL licenses, and all of them are consumed, then the next CSBL user that attempts to login will receive an error message.Ĭall me biased, but here’s why I think our combination of named users and CSBLs are a great differentiator Unlike named users, CSBL licenses do not guarantee access to a system. CSBL licenses are specific to a single deployment and cannot be shared across multiple deployments in the way that named user licenses can. This means if Susie is a CSBL user, and logs in to the BI Launchpad, Live Office, and BI Mobile, then she consumes 3 CSBL sessions. Users that are configured to use CSBL licenses consume a CSBL session with each login. They also guarantee access – they are not subject to availability of a session on the system.ĬSBLs license a session. He is now licensed to connect to all 3 of these systems. To illustrate this, imagine a company with 3 SAP BusinessObjects BI Platform deployments. Microsoft offers a CAL license, but that’s really a license for a device, not a person or a session. Note this is unlike most of our competitors, which typically use a combination of CPUs and Named Users. There are 2 ways that we license content viewing in the BI platform: What is this thing and why is it so popular? With LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.Our #1 most popular license type last year was the Concurrent Session Based License (CSBL). We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference Reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We monitor all Business Intelligence (BI) Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. See our list of best Business Intelligence (BI) Tools vendors. Hypersonix AI is most compared with, whereas SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform is most compared with Microsoft BI, Oracle OBIEE, SAP Analytics Cloud, MicroStrategy and Qlik Sense.
On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform writes "Integrates very well with SAP ERP, allows you to scale up or down anytime, and is absolutely trustworthy". Hypersonix AI is rated 0.0, while SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform is rated 7.8. Hypersonix AI is ranked 58th in Business Intelligence (BI) Tools while SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform is ranked 5th in Business Intelligence (BI) Tools with 28 reviews. More SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform Pricing and Cost Advice → If Microsoft is giving people a solution that is half of the cost of SAP, people will definitely go with Power BI." SAP needs to relax a little bit on the licensing part. That's what Microsoft has been doing, and that's why Power BI is gaining market share at the moment. They can do much better on the licensing side.
If you have budget issues, you may want to go for Power BI." In terms of price, Power BI is definitely a lot better. Power BI is probably around $9.99 per month, and the cheapest SAP BI is around $20, which is double. It is expensive even when you compare SAP BI Cloud with Microsoft Power BI.
0 kommentar(er)
